![new parkway theater the tiger hunter new parkway theater the tiger hunter](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/99/d8/a8/99d8a854e9b522f0dd307208bce663c5.jpg)
#New parkway theater the tiger hunter skin#
When I first heard about an open cereal bar, my skin crawled at the thought of random toddlers (and adults) reaching into boxes of Lucky Charms and pulling out marshmallows before picking an entirely different cereal. Parts one and two will stream on HBO Max on January 10 parts three and four will stream on January 17.Went here with my kids for the Saturday morning Cereal Cinema. I went into “Tiger” thinking that here was a fascinating subject for a docuseries because it feels like we don’t really know what it feels like to be Tiger Woods. It’s possible, but that seems a little easy. Maybe that’s part of the point of “Tiger”? Maybe all of this seeking to understand Tiger Woods comes up short because it’s really not that complicated: He’s a competitor who constantly wants to impress his dad and changed the face of his sport to do so. What’s it like to play with Tiger? What’s he like behind the scenes? Some of “Tiger” hints at this with interviews with people like Sir Nick Faldo and Rocco Mediate (and Bryant Gumbel is typically fantastic in terms of analysis and context), but too many aspects, even the golf ones, feels at a distance in “Tiger.” It’s like hearing someone’s life story only from their neighbors. Maybe those truly closest to him were asked by Tiger not to participate? Sure, we hear from his longtime caddie, teenage ex-girlfriend, and even Rachel Uchitel, but major players outside of just Tiger are missing here, including even a surprising dearth of golf experts or contemporaries. It doesn’t help that the current interview subjects are somewhat unable to rise to the occasion when it comes to discussing Woods. “Tiger” needed way more of that kind of material and significantly less highlight reel footage from major places like ESPN or his talk show appearances.
#New parkway theater the tiger hunter series#
For example, there’s a clip early in the series of young Tiger partying with friends, and it’s a looser, more relaxed version of Woods than we’re used to seeing. It’s one thing for the Woods estate to clearly be as private as they were with this production, but the glimpses we do get of personal Woods hint at a deeper, more insightful project than this blend of previously seen material with outsider commentary. Way too many of the interview subjects offer an outsider impression of the young man, either from sports journalists or people who knew Woods. Feeling like you’re constantly coming up short is not an easy way to live.Īnd yet “Tiger” struggles to really teach us anything about its subject because Hamachek and Matthew Heineman are content to turn this into a chronological mix of archival footage and interview segments. The picture of Tiger Woods that emerges is one of a man always trying to impress his father-on the golf course, with his relationships, and even with adventures in military exercises. One of the most interesting chapters of “Tiger” draws a line between Earl’s constant infidelity, often with Tiger nearby, to the issues that led to his son’s downfall. He not only shaped his golf skills but became more like a friend or brother to Tiger, arguably to the young man’s detriment. Earl Woods was everything to Tiger Woods. Tiger’s father Earl Woods is the main throughline of “Tiger,” and he’s introduced speaking about his young son as the savior of not just golf but something greater to his people.
![new parkway theater the tiger hunter new parkway theater the tiger hunter](https://i2.wp.com/tigermedianet.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/cropped-Tiger-Media-Network-Logo-FINAL-02-1024x317.png)
“Tiger” is never boring because Woods himself is an interesting figure, even if the filmmakers are unable to dig below that surface with enough force. The idea that the same pressure that shaped Woods would bring him down both physically and in the tabloids is clearly the thrust of Hamachek and Heineman’s approach, and they do connect some interesting dots along their trip through the life of one of the most famous athletes in history. The best elements of Matthew Hamachek and Matthew Heineman’s docuseries paint a portrait of someone who literally always responded to intense pressure.